|
Summary
Table 2. Weightings for Holloway Cut Adviser
| Factor | Score |
Exc. | Very Good |
Good | Fair |
Poor |
| Brilliance |
0 - 4 | 0 - 0.8 |
0.8 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.4 |
2.4 - 3.2 | 3.2 - 4.0 |
| Fire | 0 - 2 |
0 - 0.4 | 0.4 - 0.8 |
0.8 - 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.6 |
1.6 - 2.0 |
| Scintillation | 0 - 2 |
0 - 0.4 | 0.4 - 0.8 |
0.8 - 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.6 |
1.6 - 2.0 |
| Spread | 0 - 2 |
0 - 0.4 | 0.4 - 0.8 |
0.8 - 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.6 |
1.6 - 2.0 |
| Total Score | 0 - 10 |
0 - 2 | 2 - 4 |
4 - 6 | 6 – 8 |
8 - 10 |
The Table 2 shows the relative weightings allotted to each of the four factors. The uniqueness of this approach is it recognises the holistic or co-dependant nature of all of a diamonds proportions.
A summary example of total scores for diamonds with a table size of 56% is shown in the topographic chart (Fig. 17).
 Figure 17. |